[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: exception to Paul's Second Rule?
From: |
Noel Yap |
Subject: |
Re: exception to Paul's Second Rule? |
Date: |
Thu, 16 Oct 2003 17:05:32 -0400 |
Robert Mecklenburg wrote:
> %.o: %.c %.mkdir
>
> So I was thinking the target would be, say, "out/bar.o". Now, with the
> "slow" version it has prereq of "out/bar.mkdir" (In the slow version we omit
> the .. path component.) Then the command script executes:
>
> @mkdir -p $(dir out/bar.mkdir)
> @touch out/bar.mkdir
I see. Doing this would create one directory per object file (something not
entirely incorrect, but still kind messy) and would still have a race condition
when using --jobs.
Noel
--
NOTICE: If received in error, please destroy and notify sender. Sender does
not waive confidentiality or privilege, and use is prohibited.
- wildcard recursive?!, (continued)
- wildcard recursive?!, Sylvain Becker, 2003/10/17
- Re: wildcard recursive?!, Paul D. Smith, 2003/10/17
- Re: wildcard recursive?!, Dan Kegel, 2003/10/17
- RE: wildcard recursive?!, Sylvain Becker, 2003/10/17
- RE: wildcard recursive?!, Paul D. Smith, 2003/10/17
- RE: wildcard recursive?!, Sylvain Becker, 2003/10/17
- RE: wildcard recursive?!, Paul D. Smith, 2003/10/17
- Re: wildcard recursive?!, Noel Yap, 2003/10/17
Re: exception to Paul's Second Rule?, Noel Yap, 2003/10/16
Re: exception to Paul's Second Rule?, Benoit Poulot-Cazajous, 2003/10/24