Re: 3 failed tests for libidn2-2.1.1

[Dennis Clarke]

On 5/13/19 5:10 AM, Tim Rühsen wrote:
> Hi Dennis,
>
> 2.1.1a vs 2.1.1: It's the same source. Just the 2.1.1 tarball missed a
> man page due to an unrecognized error (missing ronn utility). So I
> uploaded a 2.1.1a tarball that includes the man page.
> Sorry for the inconvenience, next time I'll make up a complete new
> release - you are not the only one who was/is confused.

Ah well.  I was wondering about the version data returned.
All is well...

> I can't reproduce the issues seen in test-lookup.log on a OpenCSW
> Solaris box:
> uname -m = i86pc
> uname -r = 5.11
> uname -s = SunOS
> uname -v = 11.3
>
> Other differences are:
> - using gcc 5.5.0
> - GNU environment
> - using latest git master

That is a wildly different environment.  Not quite way out in left field
like FreeBSD on a PowerMac G5 but pretty far out.

I am sure I can crack out an acct for you on a production or dev server
that is good ol Solaris 10 but it may be a waste of effort.


--
Dennis Clarke
RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC
UNIX and Linux spoken
GreyBeard and suspenders optional