Re: Why is ENOTSUP == ECANCELED?

[Andreas Voegele]

Roland McGrath writes:

>> On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 10:35:56PM +0200, Andreas Voegele wrote:
>> > In /include/bits/errno.h both ENOTSUP and ECANCELED get the value
>> > _HURD_ERRNO(118).  Is this intended?
>> 
>> I don't think so.  Roland can you fix this if it is wrong?
>
> They certainly should not have the same number.  The Hurd numbers
> are determined by magic comments in libc/manual/errno.texi; it
> appears that someone added some codes to errno.texi with magic
> comments and picked some random numbers for them (probably Linux
> numbers) instead of omitting them.  That needs to be fixed.  Can you
> compare all the numbers in errno.texi with those that existing Hurd
> binaries were really using, and assign unused numbers to any excess
> errno codes the Hurd didn't previously have?

Currently, errno values are assigned in the ranges 1-81 and 100-118.
I think that ENOTSUP and ECANCELED are the only duplicates (besides
EAGAIN and EWOULDBLOCK).  _HURD_ERRNOS is 119.