Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles)

[Thomas Bushnell, BSG]

Richard Kreuter <kreuter@ausar.rutgers.edu> writes:

> Either way, if there are no objections, I'll excise the requirements
> under /hurd for now.

I think that servers that we expect to alawys exist, and that are
useful things for users to install as passive translators, should be
specified to be in /hurd.  This does not apply to things like exec or
proc, but does apply to hostmux, ftpfs, and so forth.

> Is there any desire to 'reserve' the location /servers/startup for
> some future use?

Not that I can see.