[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles)

From: B. Douglas Hilton
Subject: Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles)
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 18:26:29 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.9) Gecko/20020310

Guess I'll add my 2c here.

Other alternatives:

1. Put sbin inside bin: /bin/sbin
2. Put sbin inside etc: /etc/sbin

Apps dir: /apps  /local/apps

Put include inside /lib: /lib/include


Make a /os dir and then

Really though, the *NIX directory
tree was pretty well thought out,
and these silly changes would really
only be for aesthetic purposes. I
think if the administrator wants to
modify their directory tree then
it should be their perogative.

This kind of thing is an ideal job
for a Hurdish translator. Don't like
the default tree? Make a translator
and map it however you like ;-)

However, there has to be some
kind of common scenario if you want
to be able to install a pre-rolled
package of some type.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]