[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: /proc and other Linuxisms
|
From: |
Thomas Bushnell, BSG |
|
Subject: |
Re: /proc and other Linuxisms |
|
Date: |
13 Feb 2002 12:31:38 -0800 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 |
Ludovic Courtès <ludovic.courtes@utbm.fr> writes:
> $ ldd `which uname`
> libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x40020000)
> /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x40000000)
>
> The Hurd glibc should have the same symbols as the Linux' glibc,
> right?
Wrong.
- /proc and other Linuxisms, Ludovic Courtès, 2002/02/12
- Re: /proc and other Linuxisms, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/02/12
- Re: /proc and other Linuxisms, Farid Hajji, 2002/02/12
- Re: /proc and other Linuxisms, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/02/12
- Re: /proc and other Linuxisms, Jeroen Dekkers, 2002/02/13
- Re: /proc and other Linuxisms, Ludovic Courtès, 2002/02/13
- Re: /proc and other Linuxisms,
Thomas Bushnell, BSG <=
- Re: /proc and other Linuxisms, Ludovic Courtès, 2002/02/14
- Re: /proc and other Linuxisms, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/02/14
Re: /proc and other Linuxisms, Farid Hajji, 2002/02/12