[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Shared-Memory for the Hurd?
|
From: |
OKUJI Yoshinori |
|
Subject: |
Re: Shared-Memory for the Hurd? |
|
Date: |
Sat, 02 Dec 2000 04:29:36 +0900 |
From: Marcus Brinkmann <Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de>
Subject: Re: Shared-Memory for the Hurd?
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2000 13:06:11 +0100
> I don't know why Neal says libtrivfs doesn't fit the job, but I never tried
> to provide a treefs with libtrivfs. There is also libnetfs, which is also
> used by non-networked filesystems like usermux and hostmux, so maybe there
> is some value in it.
Yep, if you want to write a non-trivial translator which doesn't use
stores, libnetfs is a good choice. I even suspect that libtreefs will
be removed, because libnetfs does the equivallent.
Okuji