[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Cygwin bug? Anyone got any ideas?
From: |
Neal H Walfield |
Subject: |
Re: Cygwin bug? Anyone got any ideas? |
Date: |
Tue, 28 Nov 2000 11:05:47 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
> > Well, I am sure GNU/Linux will run better than the hurd on an old box.
> Don't know. I wish I knew everything but I don't....
Well, I am telling you it will.
> > > since the tar of my GNU System was made with a tar later than
> > > the one on the RH Linux 5.1, if it will work. So now I have to
> > > figure
> >
> > Why wouldn't tar work?
> See above. I just don't know.
It will work; The tar standard is not a moving target.
--
Neal H Walfield
University of Massachusetts at Lowell
neal@walfield.org or neal@cs.uml.edu
- Cygwin bug? Anyone got any ideas?, James Buchanan, 2000/11/27
- Re: Cygwin bug? Anyone got any ideas?, Neal H Walfield, 2000/11/27
- Re: Cygwin bug? Anyone got any ideas?, James Buchanan, 2000/11/27
- 486-Hurd (was Re: Cygwin bug? Anyone got any ideas?), Erik Hunger, 2000/11/28
- Re: 486-Hurd (was Re: Cygwin bug? Anyone got any ideas?), Marcus Brinkmann, 2000/11/28
- Re: 486-Hurd (was Re: Cygwin bug? Anyone got any ideas?), Erik Hunger, 2000/11/29
- Re: 486-Hurd (was Re: Cygwin bug? Anyone got any ideas?), Marcus Brinkmann, 2000/11/29