[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Guix Docker image inflation
From: |
zimoun |
Subject: |
Re: Guix Docker image inflation |
Date: |
Fri, 29 May 2020 20:44:47 +0200 |
On Fri, 29 May 2020 at 20:37, Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 08:21:08PM +0200, Marius Bakke wrote:
> > Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> writes:
> > > --branch and --commit would be passed to `guix pull`, and then you'd run
> > > `guix system docker-image` based on that.
> >
> > There is also 'guix time-machine --commit=abc123 -- system docker-image'.
>
> Right, that's probably more efficient than creating lots of `guix pull`
> generations.
Yes, but it is hard to apriori know the forward commit.
- Guix Docker image inflation, Stephen Scheck, 2020/05/27
- Re: Guix Docker image inflation, Leo Famulari, 2020/05/28
- Re: Guix Docker image inflation, Stephen Scheck, 2020/05/29
- Re: Guix Docker image inflation, Leo Famulari, 2020/05/29
- Re: Guix Docker image inflation, Stephen Scheck, 2020/05/29
- Re: Guix Docker image inflation, Leo Famulari, 2020/05/29
- Re: Guix Docker image inflation, Stephen Scheck, 2020/05/29
- Re: Guix Docker image inflation, Marius Bakke, 2020/05/29
- Re: Guix Docker image inflation, Leo Famulari, 2020/05/29
- Re: Guix Docker image inflation,
zimoun <=
- Re: Guix Docker image inflation, Stephen Scheck, 2020/05/29
- Re: Guix Docker image inflation, zimoun, 2020/05/29
- Re: Guix Docker image inflation, Stephen Scheck, 2020/05/29
Re: Guix Docker image inflation, zimoun, 2020/05/29
Re: Guix Docker image inflation, Chris Marusich, 2020/05/29