[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Any clue why $GUILE_LOAD_PATH not propagated with Haunt?
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: Any clue why $GUILE_LOAD_PATH not propagated with Haunt? |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Feb 2016 15:17:04 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) |
Christopher Allan Webber <address@hidden> skribis:
> Just for posterity, Dave helped me figure out what was wrong. I missed
> putting guile-2.0 in my inputs. Critical! Well, once I did that,
> things were fine!
Indeed. However, since Haunt ships a command-line tool, we should fix
the Haunt package in Guix to wrap ‘bin/haunt’ such that the tool has
GUILE_LOAD_PATH and GUILE_LOAD_COMPILED_PATH properly set.
Done in 4ecbf6d. I think it should be fixed upstream though. :-)
BTW, ‘guix build haunt --with-input=guile=guile-next’ fails at configure
time (it insists on 2.0.)
Ludo’.
- Any clue why $GUILE_LOAD_PATH not propagated with Haunt?, Christopher Allan Webber, 2016/02/09
- Re: Any clue why $GUILE_LOAD_PATH not propagated with Haunt?, Christopher Allan Webber, 2016/02/09
- Re: Any clue why $GUILE_LOAD_PATH not propagated with Haunt?,
Ludovic Courtès <=
- Re: Any clue why $GUILE_LOAD_PATH not propagated with Haunt?, Thompson, David, 2016/02/10
- Re: Any clue why $GUILE_LOAD_PATH not propagated with Haunt?, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/02/11
- Re: Any clue why $GUILE_LOAD_PATH not propagated with Haunt?, Thompson, David, 2016/02/12
- Re: Any clue why $GUILE_LOAD_PATH not propagated with Haunt?, Christopher Allan Webber, 2016/02/14
- Re: Any clue why $GUILE_LOAD_PATH not propagated with Haunt?, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/02/23