Re: [Help-gsl] Should I learn C or C++

[Sumit Adhikari]

Well, I am a very strong user of C++. D is a very interesting update for me
though. Perhaps it will take time for D to replace C++ (Also C++ users are
not much open to many other languages, just like me :)).

Learning C++ to use GSL is a misuse of time, C should be sufficient.

Regards,
Sumit



On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Jerome BENOIT <address@hidden>wrote:

> Hello List:
>
>
> On 06/04/12 11:12, Sumit Adhikari wrote:
>
>> C++ is not needed anywhere until you really need them. For GSL, C is
>> sufficient and GSL is very clean.
>>
>
> this is very true.
>
> Afterwards, D may be considered instead of C++
>
>
>  In any case you will have to learn C
>
>> before you learn C++.
>>
>
>
>> Regards,
>> Sumit
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 1:58 AM, Alexander Gallego<address@hidden>**
>> wrote:
>>
>>  Hi,
>>> I need to implement the GSL but I'm not sure if I should better learn C
>>> or
>>> C++ in order to make a correct and fast use of the library.
>>> Which language do you recommend?
>>>
>>> Thanks too much.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Alexander Gallego C.
>>> Instituto de Fí­sica, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Y Naturales.
>>> Universidad de Antioquia.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>


-- 
Sumit Adhikari,
Institute of Computer Technology,
Faculty of Electrical Engineering,
Vienna University of Technology,
Gußhausstraße 27-29,1040 Vienna