[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Help-gsl] About invalid parameters in cblas implementation
From: |
Brian Gough |
Subject: |
Re: [Help-gsl] About invalid parameters in cblas implementation |
Date: |
Wed, 22 Jul 2009 17:48:21 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) Emacs/22.2 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
At Sun, 19 Jul 2009 23:43:45 +0200,
José Luis García Pallero wrote:
> All arguments to check in cblas_* are integer, therefore we can
> implement a general macro like CHECK_LONGITUDE for checking the size
> of int arguments. This macro should be called before high level
> macros (CHECK_GEMV, etc.).
Yes, I see what you mean.
- Re: [Help-gsl] About invalid parameters in cblas implementation, (continued)
- Re: [Help-gsl] About invalid parameters in cblas implementation, Brian Gough, 2009/07/02
- Re: [Help-gsl] About invalid parameters in cblas implementation, José Luis García Pallero, 2009/07/04
- Re: [Help-gsl] About invalid parameters in cblas implementation, Brian Gough, 2009/07/06
- Re: [Help-gsl] About invalid parameters in cblas implementation, José Luis García Pallero, 2009/07/07
- Re: [Help-gsl] About invalid parameters in cblas implementation, Brian Gough, 2009/07/09
- Re: [Help-gsl] About invalid parameters in cblas implementation, José Luis García Pallero, 2009/07/11
- Re: [Help-gsl] About invalid parameters in cblas implementation, Brian Gough, 2009/07/16
- Re: [Help-gsl] About invalid parameters in cblas implementation, José Luis García Pallero, 2009/07/18
- Re: [Help-gsl] About invalid parameters in cblas implementation, Brian Gough, 2009/07/19
- Re: [Help-gsl] About invalid parameters in cblas implementation, José Luis García Pallero, 2009/07/19
- Re: [Help-gsl] About invalid parameters in cblas implementation,
Brian Gough <=
- Re: [Help-gsl] About invalid parameters in cblas implementation, José Luis García Pallero, 2009/07/24