|
From: | Pascal Hambourg |
Subject: | Re: New Grub2 verses Debian 9.5 -boots slow and strange? |
Date: | Sun, 21 Oct 2018 09:31:48 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 |
Le 21/10/2018 à 01:11, address@hidden a écrit :
On Sat, 20 Oct 2018, Pascal Hambourg wrote:No swap indeed. But there are two unformatted partitions (or with unknown format). Intriguing. Can you check withfile -s /dev/sda2 /dev/sdb5 wipefs /dev/sda2 wipefs /dev/sdb5address@hidden:/etc/initramfs-tools/conf.d# cat resume RESUME=UUID=b66a9345-332d-4abf-a081-351ab08ed7f9So there once was a swap with this UUID. But it cannot be found any more. Maybe /etc/fstab still contains information about it.You have basically two options :- remove the swap references in resume and fstab and run update-initramfs -u- or recreate a swap with the same UUID in sdb5Hi Pascal,I am nervous about running wipefs. Especially since its man page does not match is operation. plain wipefs doesn't show anything while the manpage says it should.
Dont worry about wipefs : without -o or -a, it does not erase anything and just looks for metadata signatures. Sometimes it is better than file at finding signatures.
file -s thinks the swap partitions are data?
Meaning that it found nothing.
fdisk thinks there are swap partitions.
fdisk displays the partition type identifier recorded in the partition table, which does not have to match the actual partition contents. But then we can assume they are swap partitions which should be formatted as swap.
Device Boot Start End Sectors Size Id Type /dev/sdb5 19840338 30700214 10859877 5.2G 82 Linux swap / Solaris
(...)
Device Boot Start End Sectors Size Id Type /dev/sda2 838862848 843057151 4194304 2G 82 Linux swap / Solaris
As I suggested, if you want to use sdb5 as swap you can format it with the UUID present in /etc/initramfs-tools/conf.d/resume :
mkswap --uuid b66a9345-332d-4abf-a081-351ab08ed7f9 /dev/sdb5 Did you check if /etc/fstab contains any references to swap partitions ?Also, I assume that sda2 was used by the system installed on sda and maybe this system also misses its swap partition ?
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |