[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "known in advance" public key authentication?
From: |
Florian Weimer |
Subject: |
Re: "known in advance" public key authentication? |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Nov 2012 22:12:57 +0100 |
* Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos:
> On 11/07/2012 10:52 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>
>
>> Make sure your certificates are valid X.509v3. GNUTLS is extremely
>> forgiving, and if you've got a widely deployed certificate which
>> cannot be used with Java (for instance), this can be annoying.
> What do you mean by valid X.509v3? I suppose even the authors of X.509
> wouldn't even know what that means :) Anything we could improve?
I managed to create a version 1 certificate with extensions. 8-/
- Re: "known in advance" public key authentication?, (continued)
- Re: "known in advance" public key authentication?, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos, 2012/11/07
- Re: "known in advance" public key authentication?, Ivan Shmakov, 2012/11/11
- Re: "known in advance" public key authentication?, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos, 2012/11/13
- Re: "known in advance" public key authentication?, Ivan Shmakov, 2012/11/13
- Re: "known in advance" public key authentication?, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos, 2012/11/14
- Re: "known in advance" public key authentication?, Ivan Shmakov, 2012/11/19
Re: "known in advance" public key authentication?, Ivan Shmakov, 2012/11/07
Re: "known in advance" public key authentication?, Ilari Liusvaara, 2012/11/07
Re: "known in advance" public key authentication?, Florian Weimer, 2012/11/07
Re: "known in advance" public key authentication?, Ivan Shmakov, 2012/11/07