RE: RSA sign/verify and hash generation functions

[Murray S. Kucherawy]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos [mailto:address@hidden On Behalf Of Nikos 
> Mavrogiannopoulos
> Sent: Monday, January 17, 2011 12:32 PM
> To: Murray S. Kucherawy
> Cc: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: RSA sign/verify and hash generation functions
> 
> Yes. Aboutthe non gnutls_x509_* interface I have not fixed my mind
> yet since it appears to have side-effects. The current calls you
> describe is what will work anyway.

Tested against a current master, works fine.  So right now my only calls to 
gnutls_x509_*() are gnutls_x509_privkey_init() and 
gnutls_x509_privkey_import().  Hash signing and verifying and all public key 
operations are now using the more generic (i.e., gnutls_privkey_*() and 
gnutls_pubkey_*()) interfaces.

-MSK