[Help-gnutls] Re: avoiding signals completely

[Simon Josefsson]

Daniel Stenberg <address@hidden> writes:

> On Tue, 31 Oct 2006, Simon Josefsson wrote:
>
>> Hi!  I believe the design here is that GnuTLS should use the socket
>> and the send function as-is, and if that isn't acceptable, you can
>> write a replacement for send (which may simply be a dummy function
>> that call send with an additional flag) and tell GnuTLS to use it by
>> calling gnutls_transport_set_push_function.  So you can achieve what
>> you want today by using these hooks.
>
> Aha, I hadn't paid enough attention and
> gnutls_transport_set_push_function() had slipped my mind. Thanks a lot
> for pointing it out to me.
>
> I guess this also makes GnuTLS totally ignore the socket I set to it
> with gnutls_transport_set_ptr() so that I can instead pass my own
> private struct to the callback by using that function (I mean if I
> change both push and pull)?

Yes, I believe so.

/Simon