[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Help-gnunet] OS X gui
From: |
Christian Grothoff |
Subject: |
Re: [Help-gnunet] OS X gui |
Date: |
Wed, 2 Dec 2009 21:00:07 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.12.2 (Linux/2.6.31-14-generic; KDE/4.3.2; i686; ; ) |
Hi!
First, I should mention that there is already an effort to write a COCOA
frontend (https://ng.gnunet.org/svn/gnunet-cocoa/). It has never been
released (AFAIK), and I do not know how far along the code is. My impression
is that help would be rather welcome (and I do not recall if the original
vision was to do an installer or a file-sharing GUI or both).
Second, yes, there is an API. Now, there is the "old" 0.8.x API
(src/include/gnunet_ecrs_lib.h and gnunet_fsui_lib.h mostly), and there will
be a new API for 0.9.x (svn/gnunet/src/include/gnunet_fs_service.h). Both
have some stuff in common, but the 0.9.x-API should be both more powerful and
easier to use. OTOH, 0.9.x is only partially implemented, so it would not be
as straightforward to test your code right now.
Finally, I think the mailinglist for development issues is gnunet-
address@hidden; help-gnunet is more for user-issues. I've cc'ed Heikki
Lindholm, the author of gnunet-cocoa.
Best,
Christian
On Wednesday 02 December 2009 06:08:56 am Parnell Springmeyer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This was the only list for gnunet that seemed appropriate for this topic...
>
> As I'm rather dissatisfied with the GTK GUI on Mac OS X, I have decided
> to build a Cocoa based GUI for OS X. I am, basically, looking for some
> tips and pointers.
>
> I realize the Gnunet client is separate from the GUI, so I'm assuming
> the client and its applications can be used through an API? If the
> developers could give some pointers, that would be great.
>
> I'm starting out by looking at how gnunet-gtk is built and going from
> there. I'm also a noob to Mac OS X desktop application building
> (although I've worked on iPhone apps, so it isn't alien), so it's also a
> bit of a learning project for me.
>