[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Help-gnunet] Segfault on 'gnunet-transport-check -p' with 0.7.0e
From: |
Christian Grothoff |
Subject: |
Re: [Help-gnunet] Segfault on 'gnunet-transport-check -p' with 0.7.0e |
Date: |
Sun, 20 Aug 2006 13:23:45 -0700 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.3 |
On Sunday 20 August 2006 00:38, Jérôme Blanc wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am using an up to date Mandriva 2006 x86_64. I compiled from the source
> the latest libextractor (0.5.14) and GNUnet (0.7.0e) versions.
>
> I did the basic configuration with gnunet-setup, and then generated all the
> necessary config files with gnunet-update.
>
> Following the documentation, I then tested the transports and I obtained
> the following :
>
> address@hidden ~]$ gnunet-transport-check
> Testing transport(s) udp tcp http nat
> `tcp' transport OK. It took 92ms to transmit 1 messages of 11 bytes each.
> `http': Could not send.
> `udp' transport OK. It took 2ms to transmit 1 messages of 11 bytes each.
> aoû 20 09:33:57 ERROR: `pthread_kill' failed with error code ESRCH: Aucun
> processus de ce type
>
> I've got there a first error which doesn't seem to have any effect. Still I
> guess it's not really normal ;-)
Right, IIRC this one has been fixed in SVN already.
> But then I tried with the -p options and here is a deeper trouble :
>
> address@hidden ~]$ gnunet-transport-check -p
> Available transport(s): udp tcp http nat
> Erreur de segmentation
>
> ('Erreur de segmentation' stands for 'Segmentation Fault').
>
> Is there anything I can do to find out the reason of the Segfault or that I
> might help debug it for the next version ?
Sure, read the GNUnet FAQ on reporting segmentation faults. If you follow
those instructions, you should get the information we need in order to fix
the problem.
Best,
Christian