[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Help-gnunet] Re: gnunetd aborts if `gnunet-update' wasn't run
|
From: |
Christian Grothoff |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Help-gnunet] Re: gnunetd aborts if `gnunet-update' wasn't run |
|
Date: |
Tue, 5 Oct 2004 15:21:31 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
KMail/1.7 |
On Tuesday 05 October 2004 14:05, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Today, 16 hours, 43 minutes, 18 seconds ago, Arnaud Kyheng wrote:
> > Do you mean that 'gnunet-check -a' does not imply 'gnunet-check -u' ?
>
> I think so. Christian, can you confirm it?
>
> Is `gnunet-check -u' exactly equivalent to `gnunet-update'?
No, but in the future (far far away) gnunet-check will probably disappear and
gnunet-update will do what gnunet-check -u does now. For now, gnunet-update
updates just the 'core' databases and gnunet-check -u updates the AFS
databases.
C