[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Help-gnunet] Re: gnunetd suddenly very unstable
From: |
Christian Grothoff |
Subject: |
Re: [Help-gnunet] Re: gnunetd suddenly very unstable |
Date: |
Sat, 28 Sep 2002 16:00:14 -0500 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.4.1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 27 September 2002 05:59 pm, David Hansen wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 28 at 0:30 Christian Drechsler wrote:
> > hi!
> >
> > does anyone know if any of the filesystems linux can use doesn't have
> > this limitation? i could easily reformat the partition if that was the
> > case.
>
> ext2 has a limit of 2GB but AFAIK reiserfs allows larger files.
That may be, but the question is, if it is only a FS limitation or if the gdbm
code itself has a limitation. GNUnet is internally limited to 4 GB files
(don't quote me on that, I've never tried), and while this limitation would
not apply to gdbm (since we never access that file directly), I can very well
imagine gdbm using 'signed int' to access the file.
The real question here is, if you really need to have > 2 GB in the gdbm
database (that's a huge amount of content that has been migrated; did you
actually configure GNUnet to allow using that much space -- or did we go over
the limit that was set by the user!?)
Christian
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE9lhhe9tNtMeXQLkIRAhKuAJ4qhaCRJOA+qtLNuSVL0Baw/rS8tQCeOpJ+
VNzOyWbf41Pv+WDJV5KmF3k=
=2e1/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----