[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: symlink weirdness
From: |
Roger Dahl |
Subject: |
Re: symlink weirdness |
Date: |
14 Sep 2004 08:56:33 -0700 |
Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> wrote in message
news:<barmar-5A4EDA.23452513092004@comcast.dca.giganews.com>...
> BTW, why are you asking about this in GNU newsgroups? This behavior is
> in the Unix and Linux kernel (it's the symlink() system call), not the
> GNU utilities. And I expect it's required by POSIX, so it would not be
> appropriate for the ln utility to do something different.
Barry,
Since I'm using the GNU versions of these utilities, I thought this
would be a good place to discuss these issues.
Roger
- Re: symlink weirdness, (continued)
- Re: symlink weirdness, Sam Holden, 2004/09/13
- Re: symlink weirdness, Roger Dahl, 2004/09/14
- Re: symlink weirdness, Stefan Monnier, 2004/09/14
- Re: symlink weirdness, Roger Dahl, 2004/09/15
- Re: symlink weirdness, Stefan Monnier, 2004/09/15
- Re: symlink weirdness, Roger Dahl, 2004/09/16
- Re: symlink weirdness, Paul Jarc, 2004/09/16
- Re: symlink weirdness, Barry Margolin, 2004/09/18
Re: symlink weirdness, Barry Margolin, 2004/09/13
- Re: symlink weirdness,
Roger Dahl <=
Re: symlink weirdness, Tim Smith, 2004/09/14