[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: cond construct for situation when a variable is t
From: |
Emanuel Berg |
Subject: |
Re: cond construct for situation when a variable is t |
Date: |
Sun, 20 Aug 2023 00:04:58 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Heime wrote:
> How can I use the 'cond' construct for the case when
> a variable is 't' ?
It could look like this but in practice one would probably put
it in another way, that looks better.
(setq var nil)
(cond
(var 1)
((not var) 0) )
> I can set a variable to boolean true using (setq var t), am
> I right ?
You can, you totally can. Just don't `setq' t to anything ;)
--
underground experts united
https://dataswamp.org/~incal