Re: How to tame compiler?

[Michael Heerdegen]

Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:

> I know I sound like a broken clock, but I think a better answer is to
> avoid `eval`: instead of taking expressions (that you'd pass to `eval`)
> arrange to receive functions (which you'd pass to `funcall` or `apply`).
> Then you can pass those functions the data they need (e.g. the value of
> things like `unsubscribe-text`).

How could that be implemented when he wants his templates to accept
arbitrary Lisp code to be evaluated?

Regards,

Michael.