[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer"
|
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
|
Subject: |
Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer" |
|
Date: |
Wed, 31 Jul 2019 08:18:09 -0400 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
> No need, I guess. I'm on (relatively fresh) master and it's behaving
> like this for some time already (I've just checked on emacs -Q).
Good point.
> While we're at that, sometimes I'd like to have also timestamps there.
Hmm... I can't remember ever feeling like timestamps would be helpful.
Do you have some scenario in mind?
Stefan
- Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer", (continued)
- Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer", Emanuel Berg, 2019/07/30
- Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer", Marcin Borkowski, 2019/07/31
- Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer", Emanuel Berg, 2019/07/31
- Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer", Marcin Borkowski, 2019/07/31
- Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer", Emanuel Berg, 2019/07/31
- Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer", Marcin Borkowski, 2019/07/31
- Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer", Dan Sommers, 2019/07/31
- Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer", Marcin Borkowski, 2019/07/31
- Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer", Yuri Khan, 2019/07/31
- Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer", Emanuel Berg, 2019/07/31
- Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer",
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: improvements to the "lossage buffer", Marcin Borkowski, 2019/07/31