[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Disemvowelment Mode?
From: |
Grant Rettke |
Subject: |
Re: Disemvowelment Mode? |
Date: |
Wed, 15 May 2019 14:12:40 -0500 |
On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 3:02 AM Joost Kremers <joostkremers@fastmail.fm> wrote:
> The thing that I still don't understand, is why you would want to
> convert the document to shorthand at all?
> (AND)
> Why would it
> matter when some of the words are written in full?
I feel like it is easier to read when 100% is shortened instead of 3/4
that I shortened
and 1/4 that I didn't. I would only convert something like that.
> Isn't the purpose in the
> end to have a legible written version of the talk?
>From what I have tried so far the shorthand version is easy to read but yea if
I wrote it all perfectly like Paul explained then I would never convert it.
> If you use a timer, there's no reason AFAICT to *not* create a minor mode for
> it.
Good point, thanks!
Re: Disemvowelment Mode?, Emanuel Berg, 2019/05/14