[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 1L?
From: |
Emanuel Berg |
Subject: |
Re: 1L? |
Date: |
Thu, 07 Feb 2019 20:51:20 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) |
조성빈 wrote:
> Well, as far as I know, w3m can’t execute
> Javascript, right? It’s not a viable
> alternative to ‘real’ web browsers.
It depends what web pages you are visiting, but
obviously you are right if you want JavaScript.
But you can still use Emacs-w3m for everything
else, to have all the advantages since it is
integrated with Emacs and have the familiar
Emacs/Elisp customization/extension
interface.
And then have Firefox or whatever on the side
for maps, gear, and other stuff that rely
on JavaScript.
Even so, what you call real web browsers (with
JavaScript) are available on Linux systems, and
many other systems as well for that matter,
just as they are on the Apple OSs. Which I'm
sure you are aware of BTW.
> “Hey, use Linux! It’s free, and Apple is
> bad... Why use Apple when they don’t let them
> roll our own devices?”
Why indeed? :)
--
underground experts united
http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573
- 1L? (was: Suggestions for 1L computer to run Emacs 2019), Skip Montanaro, 2019/02/06
- Re: 1L?, Stefan Monnier, 2019/02/06
- Re: 1L?, Emanuel Berg, 2019/02/06
- Re: 1L?, Van L, 2019/02/07
- Re: 1L?, 조성빈, 2019/02/07
- Re: 1L?, Emanuel Berg, 2019/02/07
- Re: 1L?, 조성빈, 2019/02/07
- Re: 1L?,
Emanuel Berg <=
- Re: 1L?, 조성빈, 2019/02/07
- Re: 1L?, Emanuel Berg, 2019/02/08
- Re: 1L?, Vladimir Sedach, 2019/02/08
- Message not available
- Re: 1L?, Emanuel Berg, 2019/02/08
- Re: 1L?, Van L, 2019/02/08
- Re: 1L?, Emanuel Berg, 2019/02/08
- Re: 1L?, Emanuel Berg, 2019/02/07
- Re: 1L?, Van L, 2019/02/08
- Re: 1L?, tomas, 2019/02/08
- Re: 1L?, Emanuel Berg, 2019/02/08