[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs Book Vs Emacs Manuals
From: |
tomas |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs Book Vs Emacs Manuals |
Date: |
Wed, 13 May 2015 09:47:35 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 08:45:39PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
[...]
> I would start by typing "i directory TAB", then see "directory
> listing" there, and select it. And there, lo and behold, I'd see
> this:
Really good example you got there, which nicely stresses the strengths
and weaknesses of the whole thing. Two notes:
1. I've been using Emacs for quite a while. I'm perhaps atypical
in that I learn in leaps and bounds and not very systematically.
It took me several years (three? four?) to learn about "i".
Before, I used "s". I shouldn't have been allowed to *touch*
Emacs without knowing about Info's "i" (see below for some
thoughts on that)
2. I enter "i folder TAB" and get no entries. Hmmm.
Ad 1: I think an intro should blaze a wide track collecting the
indispensable tools to get up and running (and only hinting at
alternatives).
Which are the "indispensable tools" is very much a matter of taste
and of "current fashion": it will vary over users and time.
Most user nowadays will be happy to use the (these days) conventional
cursor keys for movement (and discover to their delight that C-Left
jumps by words, wow!), click on menus and so on. Thus (one variant of)
tutorial would *only hint* (with links) at the existence of C-f etc.
which are so close to the hearts of the old garde. Heck, I'm an
old fart and *even on vi* (which I spell vim) I don't "HJKL" but use
the cursor keys (which are more within reach these days as nearly
everyone who has still a keyboard is on some kind of netbook).
Ad 2: As Emacs is used by a more diverse population, it has to talk
a broader language set. Besides, language(s) evolve over time.
I know that there's an effort to add synonyms to the index (see?
I tried to look up "synonym" in the info manual. No hits ;-) --
but I don't believe that it scales as it is, done by hand by
a handful of heroes (no, really, I have a ton of appreciation for
this work: Emacs has given me more joy that I'm able to express
in a few words) -- one bug report at a time.
I think we need new ideas here, therefore I'm really excited that
Vaidheeswaran C is taking a try at it. Thanks!
Regards
- -- tomás
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAlVTAZcACgkQBcgs9XrR2kYrmwCeIN51fAqqSoJ/7FyQ4YYd0P/X
3GIAn1lB5a/AnxuxXKSqcFIqU078V42V
=2p7g
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Re: Emacs Book Vs Emacs Manuals, (continued)
- RE: Emacs Book Vs Emacs Manuals, Drew Adams, 2015/05/11
- Re: Emacs Book Vs Emacs Manuals, Stefan Monnier, 2015/05/11
- RE: Emacs Book Vs Emacs Manuals, Drew Adams, 2015/05/11
- Message not available
- Re: Emacs Book Vs Emacs Manuals, Rusi, 2015/05/12
- Re: Emacs Book Vs Emacs Manuals, Rasmus, 2015/05/12
- Re: Emacs Book Vs Emacs Manuals, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/05/12
- Message not available
- Re: Emacs Book Vs Emacs Manuals, Rusi, 2015/05/12
- Re: Emacs Book Vs Emacs Manuals, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/05/12
- Re: Emacs Book Vs Emacs Manuals,
tomas <=
- Re: Emacs Book Vs Emacs Manuals, Filipp Gunbin, 2015/05/13
- Re: Emacs Book Vs Emacs Manuals, tomas, 2015/05/13
- Re: Emacs Book Vs Emacs Manuals, Filipp Gunbin, 2015/05/13
- Re: Emacs Book Vs Emacs Manuals, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/05/13
- Message not available
- Re: Emacs Book Vs Emacs Manuals, Rusi, 2015/05/14
- Re: Emacs Book Vs Emacs Manuals, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/05/15
- Message not available
- Re: Emacs Book Vs Emacs Manuals, Rusi, 2015/05/15
- Re: Emacs Book Vs Emacs Manuals, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/05/15
- Re: Emacs Book Vs Emacs Manuals, Phillip Lord, 2015/05/15
- Message not available
- Re: Emacs Book Vs Emacs Manuals, Rusi, 2015/05/15