|
From: | Steven Degutis |
Subject: | Re: Is there an easier way to jump to the same word? |
Date: | Fri, 12 Apr 2013 19:22:20 -0500 |
> Are these functions defining word boundaries? What are the \\< and \(current-word t t) would better suits my own needs actually.
> \> used for? Using (current-word) should probably be sufficient, no?
In that case, I think your first recipe (C-s C-w C-s) is the shortest
> Also, I didn't realize this until after I tried Chris's solution, but
> I also need it to highlight other occurrences of (current-word) in
> the buffer.
solution.
HTH,
--
Bastien
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |