[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Better vertical-ness in ido-mode?
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Better vertical-ness in ido-mode? |
Date: |
Wed, 03 Apr 2013 09:30:14 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
> I've tried helm, and it's way too overkill for this small task. It's much
> too heavyweight, uses buffers and leaves them sitting around, and does way
> too many things. Now ido-mode is *almost* perfect for completion and
> narrowing when used vertically. It just has a few quirks because it was
> never imagined to be used this way by the developers.
On a related note: it might be interesting to change icomplete.el such
that it can display the completions using a tooltip frame rather than
"inline" in the minibuffer.
Stefan
- Better vertical-ness in ido-mode?, Steven Degutis, 2013/04/02
- Re: Better vertical-ness in ido-mode?,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: Better vertical-ness in ido-mode?, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/04/03
- Re: Better vertical-ness in ido-mode?, Stefan Monnier, 2013/04/03
- Re: Better vertical-ness in ido-mode?, Steven Degutis, 2013/04/03
- Re: Better vertical-ness in ido-mode?, Tom, 2013/04/04
- Re: Better vertical-ness in ido-mode?, Steven Degutis, 2013/04/04
- Re: Better vertical-ness in ido-mode?, Steven Degutis, 2013/04/04
- Re: Better vertical-ness in ido-mode?, Stefan Monnier, 2013/04/04
- Re: Better vertical-ness in ido-mode?, Steven Degutis, 2013/04/05
- Re: Better vertical-ness in ido-mode?, Stefan Monnier, 2013/04/05