Re: What's your favourite *under_publicized* editing feature ofEmacs?

[Cthun]

On 02/03/2011 3:39 AM, TheFlyingDutchman wrote:
> On Mar 1, 3:43 pm, Cthun<cthun_...@qmail.net.au>  wrote:
> > On 01/03/2011 5:51 PM, TheFlyingDutchman wrote:
> > > On Mar 1, 5:52 am, Cthun<cthun_...@qmail.net.au>    wrote:
> > > > Except that it's not called "COMMON LISP", Kastrup.
> >
> > > Because it is not an acronymn, Cthun.
> >
> > What does that have to do with emacs, Dutchman?
>
> Why did the Cthun-bot talk about COMMON LISP and then revert to emacs?

Who is "Cthun-bot", Dutchman? There is nobody in this newsgroup using 
that alias.

> Are they doing any testing at all?

What does your question have to do with Lisp, Dutchman?

> > The languages whose names are in all caps seem to be the ones that cause
> > brain damage, Dutchman, and Common Lisp is not among them.
>
> It is always refreshing when the Cthun-bot can spit out a sentence
> that differs from it's normal small set

Who is "Cthun-bot", Dutchman? There is nobody in this newsgroup using 
that alias.

> even if it doesn't make any sense.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.