[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: TAGS
From: |
simon cossar |
Subject: |
Re: TAGS |
Date: |
Sun, 23 Jan 2011 13:50:31 -0800 |
Thank you for your replies, I was looking everywhere for the elisp
source code - it's good to know it isn't there. I learned a lot about my
file system in the process. It would be great to see the .el files, as
I'm finding emacs lisp combined with the C-h f function surprisingly
easy to read.
Thanks again,
Simon
On Sun, 2011-01-23 at 09:24 -0600, Perry Smith wrote:
> On Jan 23, 2011, at 5:17 AM, Peter Dyballa wrote:
>
> >
> > Am 23.01.2011 um 09:12 schrieb simon cossar:
> >
> >> I am finding all sorts of .elc files. Is it possible that everything has
> >> been byte-compiled?
> >
> > To save space an installation of GNU Emacs can be done by only installing
> > the ELC files. If you want to see the EL files, i.e., it's not enough for
> > you what C-h f <function name> RET returns, then get the GNU Emacs source
> > code. Which is now at #23.2.
>
> Also, it might work to post this same question to an ubuntu list asking for
> what to install to get the source.
>
> In case you didn't get the gist of the previous replies, there are two kinds
> of source: elisp and c. With a nice full install (like my Mac has), I can do
> C-h <function> to get the built in help. And then I'll have a link at the
> top that will take me to the source no matter whether it is in lisp or C.
> Very very nice to have.
>
> Good luck.
>
> Perry
>
- TAGS, simon cossar, 2011/01/23
- Re: TAGS, Peter Dyballa, 2011/01/23
- Message not available
- Re: TAGS, rusi, 2011/01/23
- Re: TAGS,
simon cossar <=
Message not available
- Re: TAGS, rusi, 2011/01/23
- Re: TAGS, Memnon Anon, 2011/01/23
- Message not available
Re: TAGS, harven, 2011/01/23