Re: random predicate function

[Pascal J. Bourguignon]

Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> writes:

> I agree the CL macros are nicer, but the non-macro version is much
> easier to debug *in GNU Emacs* and it's already installed.  So they both
> have benefits.

I don't see how code without macros is easier to debug, there are so
many macros in lisp code.


> Can your `shuffle' be part of cl-extra.el in Emacs?  I like the brevity
> of it, and it's a good example of how to use `loop' properly.

shuffle is not a Common Lisp function, so it should not be added to
cl-extra, but it could be included in an emacs lisp library.

-- 
__Pascal Bourguignon__                     http://www.informatimago.com/
A bad day in () is better than a good day in {}.