Re: cperl-mode

[LanX]

Hi

> I have no idea.  All I know is that elisp is very much pessimized; for
> the speed reasons, I would prefer to use simplest constructs (the
> initial version could have been hundreds times slower than the

OK, just wanna understand not criticize.

> (But this late in development cycle, I doubt I would change such
> things now.)

IMHO refactoring gradually to a macro construct should do it safely
and fast, something like (value i keyname) translating to (elt i
keyindex)


> There may be some benchmarks around; I just do not know about them.

Hmm do you have any automated testing framework, e.g. for syntax
parsing?

Cheers
  Rolf