[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: C-x C-b (switch-to-buffer) smarter suggestions?
From: |
Jorgen Grahn |
Subject: |
Re: C-x C-b (switch-to-buffer) smarter suggestions? |
Date: |
8 Feb 2010 11:45:32 GMT |
User-agent: |
slrn/pre0.9.9-111 (Linux) |
On Mon, 2010-02-08, Dmitri Minaev wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se>
> wrote:
>>
>> C-x C-b foo TAB
>>
>> But this doesn't complete to foo.h, because foo.c is also an
>> alternative -- even though that's the buffer I'm explicitly trying to
>> switch *from*.
>
> iswitchb?
News to me. Thanks! It's a bit *too* smart for my taste, but could
serve as a starting point for a home-grown customization.
/Jorgen
--
// Jorgen Grahn <grahn@ Oo o. . .
\X/ snipabacken.se> O o .
Re: C-x C-b (switch-to-buffer) smarter suggestions?, Dmitri Minaev, 2010/02/08
Message not available
Re: C-x C-b (switch-to-buffer) smarter suggestions?, Kevin Rodgers, 2010/02/08
Message not available
- Re: C-x C-b (switch-to-buffer) smarter suggestions?,
Jorgen Grahn <=
Message not available