[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: string-match bug?
From: |
Matthew Dempsky |
Subject: |
Re: string-match bug? |
Date: |
Tue, 8 Dec 2009 15:48:20 -0800 |
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
> If
> (string-match (concat regex1 regex2) (concat str1 str2))
> then
> (and (string-match regex1 str1) (string-match regex2 str2))
Not quite: STRING-MATCH searches for a substring that matches a
specified regexp; it doesn't return whether the whole string matches
the regexp.
- Re: string-match bug?, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: string-match bug?, David Kastrup, 2009/12/14
- Message not available
- Re: string-match bug?, Barry Margolin, 2009/12/07
- Re: string-match bug?, Andreas Röhler, 2009/12/08
- Re: string-match bug?, Peter Dyballa, 2009/12/08
- Re: string-match bug?, Andreas Röhler, 2009/12/08
- Message not available
- Re: string-match bug?, Barry Margolin, 2009/12/08
- Re: string-match bug?, Pascal J. Bourguignon, 2009/12/08
- Re: string-match bug?, Stefan Monnier, 2009/12/09
- Re: string-match bug?,
Matthew Dempsky <=
- Re: string-match bug?, Andreas Röhler, 2009/12/09
- Re: string-match bug?, Juanma Barranquero, 2009/12/09
- Re: string-match bug?, Andreas Röhler, 2009/12/09
- Re: string-match bug?, Matthew Dempsky, 2009/12/09
- Re: string-match bug?, tomas, 2009/12/09
- Re: string-match bug?, Andreas Röhler, 2009/12/09
- Re: string-match bug?, Matthew Dempsky, 2009/12/09
- Message not available
- Re: string-match bug?, Barry Margolin, 2009/12/09
- Re: string-match bug?, tomas, 2009/12/09
- Re: string-match bug?, Kevin Rodgers, 2009/12/09