[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: variable's documentation string
From: |
TheFlyingDutchman |
Subject: |
Re: variable's documentation string |
Date: |
Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:30:16 -0700 (PDT) |
User-agent: |
G2/1.0 |
>
> That's not the way Lisp works. When the form 'some_variable was read,
> the symbol was created (with a void value, void function, and nil
> property list).
>
> If you evaluate (symbol-value 'some_variable) or (symbol-function
> 'some_variable), you'll get an error. But not (symbol-plist
> 'some_variable).
>
Thanks Kevin. That certainly is "interesting" behavior. Not what I
would prefer. Is there a way to test that a symbols value and function
are void without getting an error?
- variable's documentation string, TheFlyingDutchman, 2009/06/29
- Re: variable's documentation string, TheFlyingDutchman, 2009/06/29
- Re: variable's documentation string, Pascal J. Bourguignon, 2009/06/29
- Re: variable's documentation string, TheFlyingDutchman, 2009/06/30
- Re: variable's documentation string, Kevin Rodgers, 2009/06/30
- Re: variable's documentation string, Pascal J. Bourguignon, 2009/06/30
- Re: variable's documentation string, TheFlyingDutchman, 2009/06/30
- Re: variable's documentation string, Pascal J. Bourguignon, 2009/06/30
- Message not available
- Re: variable's documentation string,
TheFlyingDutchman <=
- Re: variable's documentation string, Pascal J. Bourguignon, 2009/06/30