help-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Message goto signature


From: Richard Riley
Subject: Re: Message goto signature
Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2009 15:02:18 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.91 (gnu/linux)

Francis Moreau <francis.moro@gmail.com> writes:

> On Mar 6, 12:03 am, Richard Riley <rileyrg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Francis Moreau <francis.m...@gmail.com> writes:
>> > Reiner Steib <reinersteib+gm...@imap.cc> writes:
>>
>> >> On Thu, Mar 05 2009, Richard Riley wrote:
>>
>> >>> Francis Moreau <francis.m...@gmail.com> writes:
>> >>>> Actually I don't see any use case where moving between the separator
>> >>>> and the signature is usefull...
>>
>> >> To edit the signature?
>>
>> > Hmm do you usually edit your signature ?
>>
>> > I don't and never have the need. But the fact is I usually need to go
>> > to the bottom of the body.
>>
>> > thanks
>>
>> This works for followup:
>>
>> (defadvice gnus-summary-followup (after followup-sig
>> activate)(progn (message-goto-signature)(previous-line)(previous-line)))
>>
>> And this for reply:
>>
>> (defadvice gnus-summary-reply-with-original (after reply-sig
>> activate)(progn (message-goto-signature)(previous-line)(previous-line)))
>>
>> I dont know if there is a better way than previous-line.
>>
>> I am assuming its cleaner to do it at this level then
>> message-goto-signature
>>
>
> Thanks for this.
>
> But the point of my initial question was about the default behaviour
> of goto-signature.
> I don't see the point why it puts the cursor where it does so I was
> asking in case I
> miss something.

Oh, I thought you were looking for a solution to put your cursor where
you wanted to type on reply/followup. In fact I'm certain it was :-;

,----
| I don't and never have the need. But the fact is I usually need to go
| to the bottom of the body.
`----

In that case I can help.

The function is called "goto-signature", not "goto-end-of.article" :-)

So it works as designed I think. And correctly.

>
> thanks

-- 
 important and urgent problems of the technology of today are no longer the 
satisfactions of the primary needs or of archetypal wishes, but the reparation 
of the evils and damages by the technology of yesterday.  ~Dennis Gabor, 
Innovations:  Scientific, Technological and Social, 1970


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]