[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "MIT/GNU/Linux"
From: |
Robert Thorpe |
Subject: |
Re: "MIT/GNU/Linux" |
Date: |
30 Dec 2006 09:19:49 -0800 |
User-agent: |
G2/1.0 |
Micha Feigin wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+michf=post.tau.ac.il@gnu.org
> > [mailto:help-gnu-emacs-bounces+michf=post.tau.ac.il@gnu.org]
> > On Behalf Of Jay Belanger
> > Sent: Saturday, December 30, 2006 1:13 AM
> > To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
> > Cc: belanger@truman.edu
> > Subject: Re: "MIT/GNU/Linux"
> >
> >
> > "Micha Feigin" <michf@post.tau.ac.il> writes:
> > ...
> > > What if you replace GNU tools? (there are alternative
> > options to most
> > > if not
> > > all)
> >
> > Then it wouldn't be GNU/Linux anymore, would it? As far as
> > this thread goes, I'm not sure I see the point of this
> > question. Replacing the GNU toolchain has been suggested
> > before, but as far as I know never done. I suspect this
> > would be difficult.
> >
>
> Most if not all embeded systems do this ...
Normally they don't replace it, they just do without most of it,
resulting in a system very unlike a *nix, but one that certainly
qualifies as "linux".
- Re: "MIT/GNU/Linux", (continued)
- Re: "MIT/GNU/Linux", Matthew Flaschen, 2006/12/30
- Message not available
- Re: "MIT/GNU/Linux", Tim X, 2006/12/30
- Re: "MIT/GNU/Linux", Matthew Flaschen, 2006/12/30
- Message not available
- Re: "MIT/GNU/Linux", Tim X, 2006/12/30
- Re: "MIT/GNU/Linux", Giorgos Keramidas, 2006/12/31
- Re: "MIT/GNU/Linux", Tim X, 2006/12/31
Re: "MIT/GNU/Linux", Giorgos Keramidas, 2006/12/31
Re: "MIT/GNU/Linux", Jay Belanger, 2006/12/29
- RE: "MIT/GNU/Linux", Micha Feigin, 2006/12/30
- Message not available
- Re: "MIT/GNU/Linux",
Robert Thorpe <=