[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: State-machine based syntax highlighting
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: State-machine based syntax highlighting |
Date: |
Fri, 08 Dec 2006 21:10:01 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.91 (gnu/linux) |
> As far as I can see implementing a data-driven GLR parser into Emacs is
> the way to go. That way the parser could interface directly with the
> buffer.
You may be right. After all, a GLR grammar for a language can be easily
turned into a GLR grammar for the reversed language, so it could also be
used for backward parsing, which I find to be important for indentation.
Stefan
- Re: State-machine based syntax highlighting, (continued)
- Re: State-machine based syntax highlighting, address@hidden, 2006/12/08
- Re: State-machine based syntax highlighting, Tim X, 2006/12/08
- Re: State-machine based syntax highlighting, address@hidden, 2006/12/08
- Re: State-machine based syntax highlighting, Robert Thorpe, 2006/12/08
- Re: State-machine based syntax highlighting, address@hidden, 2006/12/08
- Re: State-machine based syntax highlighting, Stefan Monnier, 2006/12/08
- Re: State-machine based syntax highlighting, Stefan Monnier, 2006/12/08
- Re: State-machine based syntax highlighting, Lennart Borgman, 2006/12/08
- Re: State-machine based syntax highlighting, Leo, 2006/12/08
- Re: State-machine based syntax highlighting, Robert Thorpe, 2006/12/08
- Re: State-machine based syntax highlighting,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Message not available
- Re: State-machine based syntax highlighting, Robert Thorpe, 2006/12/08
- Re: State-machine based syntax highlighting, address@hidden, 2006/12/08
- Message not available
- Re: State-machine based syntax highlighting, Robert Thorpe, 2006/12/08
- Re: State-machine based syntax highlighting, Stefan Monnier, 2006/12/07
- Re: State-machine based syntax highlighting, address@hidden, 2006/12/07
- Re: State-machine based syntax highlighting, Robert Thorpe, 2006/12/08