[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Q on minibuffer-message
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
Q on minibuffer-message |
Date: |
Fri, 20 Jan 2006 11:23:28 -0800 |
I have a command `foo' that calls `minibuffer-message' at various points.
I want to call this function from another command, `bar', but I don't want
the `minibuffer-message' display to wait for two seconds - I even don't care
if it is displayed at all in this case.
I could change the definition of command `foo', to pass it a flag to not
call `minibuffer-message' (or to call it only when the command is called
interactively), but I'd rather not have to resort to that.
`minibuffer-message' displays its message for two seconds, unless an input
event is received during this time. My question is: How can I inhibit the
2-second wait? Is there, for example, some way I can simulate an input
event? Or is there a simpler, cleaner way?
In command `bar', just after calling `foo', I tried (sit-for 0), to no
avail. I tried adding a fake event (e.g. a character) to
`unread-command-events', to no avail. I tried binding
`minibuffer-message-timeout' (to nil and to 0), to no avail (it seemed to
have no effect).
Anyone have a suggestion?
- Q on minibuffer-message,
Drew Adams <=
- Re: Q on minibuffer-message, Lennart Borgman, 2006/01/20
- RE: Q on minibuffer-message, Drew Adams, 2006/01/20
- Re: Q on minibuffer-message, Richard M. Stallman, 2006/01/22
- RE: Q on minibuffer-message, Drew Adams, 2006/01/22
- Re: Q on minibuffer-message, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/01/22
- Re: Q on minibuffer-message, Ian Zimmerman, 2006/01/23
- RE: Q on minibuffer-message, Drew Adams, 2006/01/23
- Re: Q on minibuffer-message, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/01/23
- RE: Q on minibuffer-message, Drew Adams, 2006/01/23
- Re: Q on minibuffer-message, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/01/23