[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: umlauts (8bit characters) input
From: |
Peter Dyballa |
Subject: |
Re: umlauts (8bit characters) input |
Date: |
Tue, 1 Feb 2005 16:25:00 +0100 |
Am 01.02.2005 um 14:37 schrieb Hendrik Sattler:
And yes, works now. The main difference is that xterm.el adds:
(define-key function-key-map "\e[A" [up])
(define-key function-key-map "\e[B" [down])
(define-key function-key-map "\e[C" [right])
(define-key function-key-map "\e[D" [left])
These and the others are the ANSI escape codes these keys generate. (If
you need proof: type C-q and then hit the funktion or numerical keypad
key -- you'll see such a sequence.) xterm.el simply assign these
multiple bytes sequences a name or function that Emacs can handle these
events when running inside a terminal emulation.
--
Mit friedvollen Grüßen
Pete
"Computers are good at following instructions,
but not at reading your mind."
D. E. Knuth, The TeXbook, Addison-Wesley 1984, 1986, 1996, p. 9
- Re: umlauts (8bit characters) input, Peter Dyballa, 2005/02/01
- Re: umlauts (8bit characters) input, Hendrik Sattler, 2005/02/01
- Re: umlauts (8bit characters) input, David Kastrup, 2005/02/01
- Re: umlauts (8bit characters) input, Peter Dyballa, 2005/02/02
- Message not available
- Re: umlauts (8bit characters) input, David Kastrup, 2005/02/02
- Re: umlauts (8bit characters) input, Peter Dyballa, 2005/02/02
- Message not available
- Re: umlauts (8bit characters) input, David Kastrup, 2005/02/02
- Re: umlauts (8bit characters) input, Ismael Valladolid Torres, 2005/02/02
- Re: umlauts (8bit characters) input, Peter Dyballa, 2005/02/02
- Re: umlauts (8bit characters) input, Peter Dyballa, 2005/02/02
- Message not available
- Re: umlauts (8bit characters) input, Stefan Monnier, 2005/02/02
- Re: umlauts (8bit characters) input, Peter Dyballa, 2005/02/02
- Message not available
- Re: umlauts (8bit characters) input, Stefan Monnier, 2005/02/02