[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacs for everything?
From: |
Pascal Bourguignon |
Subject: |
Re: emacs for everything? |
Date: |
21 Nov 2004 17:22:21 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 |
Jay Belanger <belanger@truman.edu> writes:
> Pascal Bourguignon <spam@mouse-potato.com> writes:
> > Kai Grossjohann <kai@emptydomain.de> writes:
> ...
> >> Currently, I use OpenBox. It's painful, but I can bear it.
> >
> > You should try clumpwm: it's written in Common-Lisp and modifiable
> > on the fly.
>
> Do you meant StumpWM?
Yes.
I'm wondering whether AI can ever be reached with neural-networks.
I'd rather bet for strong _symbolic_ AI...
> It's eventually going to be a common lisp successor to ratpoison; not
> as featureful yet, but still pretty cool.
--
__Pascal Bourguignon__ http://www.informatimago.com/
The world will now reboot; don't bother saving your artefacts.
- Re: emacs for everything?, (continued)
- Re: emacs for everything?, Joe Corneli, 2004/11/16
- Re: emacs for everything?, Joe Corneli, 2004/11/16
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: emacs for everything?, Pascal Bourguignon, 2004/11/20
- Re: emacs for everything?, Jay Belanger, 2004/11/20
- Re: emacs for everything?, Alan Mackenzie, 2004/11/21
- Re: emacs for everything?, Joe Corneli, 2004/11/21
- Re: emacs for everything?,
Pascal Bourguignon <=
- Message not available
- Re: emacs for everything?, Floyd L. Davidson, 2004/11/20
- Re: emacs for everything?, Kai Grossjohann, 2004/11/22
- Re: emacs for everything?, John Sullivan, 2004/11/22
- Re: emacs for everything?, Maciek Pasternacki, 2004/11/23
- Re: emacs for everything?, Kai Grossjohann, 2004/11/25
- Re: emacs for everything?, Maciek Pasternacki, 2004/11/25
- Re: emacs for everything?, Kai Grossjohann, 2004/11/26
- Re: emacs for everything?, Maciek Pasternacki, 2004/11/27
- Re: emacs for everything?, Kai Grossjohann, 2004/11/27
- Re: emacs for everything?, Maciek Pasternacki, 2004/11/27