[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNU.org is down
From: |
Bob Nelson |
Subject: |
Re: GNU.org is down |
Date: |
Fri, 12 Dec 2003 07:53:23 GMT |
User-agent: |
tin/1.5.12-20020427 ("Sugar") (UNIX) (Linux/2.4.23 (i686)) |
David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> wrote:
> Maintaining a consistent high level of security causes a severe drain
> of usability and accessibility (as you have noticed), and it also
> requires considerable human resources permanently.
> What kind of people gleefully cause a considerable permanent damage to
> a charity instead of elsewhere "just" for the hope of monetary gains?
> I hope that they are found and dealt with in proportion to their
> crime and the impact it will have.
``Dealing'' with the ``crime'' implies punishment, unless I misread your
intent, David. But that only addresses the symptom.
- Instead the objective should be to find out what may have motivated
such a course of action from the individual(s) involved. Perhaps there
are cultural or ethical differences that need to be taken into account,
appreciated and understood.
- GNU.org is down, Markus Weimer, 2003/12/09
- Re: GNU.org is down, David Steuber, 2003/12/10
- Re: GNU.org is down, Pascal Bourguignon, 2003/12/10
- Re: GNU.org is down, David Steuber, 2003/12/10
- Re: GNU.org is down, David Kastrup, 2003/12/10
- Re: GNU.org is down, Tim McNamara, 2003/12/10
- Re: GNU.org is down,
Bob Nelson <=
- Re: GNU.org is down, me, 2003/12/13
- Re: GNU.org is down, David Steuber, 2003/12/14
- Re: GNU.org is down, Bob Nelson, 2003/12/15
- Re: GNU.org is down, Kevin Rodgers, 2003/12/15
- Re: GNU.org is down, David Steuber, 2003/12/15
- Re: GNU.org is down, Tim McNamara, 2003/12/16
- Re: GNU.org is down, David Kastrup, 2003/12/16
- Re: GNU.org is down, Tim McNamara, 2003/12/16
- Re: GNU.org is down, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/12/10
- Re: GNU.org is down, V. L. Simpson, 2003/12/11