[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Possible emacs bug.
From: |
Barry Margolin |
Subject: |
Re: Possible emacs bug. |
Date: |
Mon, 25 Nov 2002 19:16:01 GMT |
In article <84k7j4au5k.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>,
Kai Großjohann <kai.grossjohann@uni-duisburg.de> wrote:
>Edric M Ellis <eellis@mathworks.co.uk> writes:
>
>> This seems to be because of the way ``beginning-of-defun'' works.
>
>Whee. I think it's fine that beginning-of-defun takes some shortcuts
>for indentation and movement, but maybe C-M-x should produce a more
>correct result? OTOH, then it might take very long for C-M-x to do
>its thing.
All the commands that operate on on a "defun" use the same definition of
what a function definition is. This is good for consistency, and also for
performance.
--
Barry Margolin, barmar@genuity.net
Genuity, Woburn, MA
*** DON'T SEND TECHNICAL QUESTIONS DIRECTLY TO ME, post them to newsgroups.
Please DON'T copy followups to me -- I'll assume it wasn't posted to the group.