[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: command.com versus cmd.exe
From: |
Klaus Berndl |
Subject: |
Re: command.com versus cmd.exe |
Date: |
13 Sep 2002 10:49:32 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 |
On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Kai Großjohann wrote:
> Zhongtao Zhu <zhongtao@tsinghua.edu.cn> writes:
>
> > By building Emacs from the nt/ directory in MS Windows, every thing
> > works successfully well. I now check the variable `shell-file-name' in
> > my machine it is set with "D:/emacs/bin/cmdproxy.exe".
>
> Cool, then I can just use that! Hm.
If you do not need the distinction between cmd.exe and command.com for special
purposes (do not know) nut only a mechanism to execute stuff with the
windows-system then you should definitely use cmdproxy.exe. I agree
completely with Zhongtao!
Klaus
--
Klaus Berndl mailto: klaus.berndl@sdm.de
sd&m AG http://www.sdm.de
software design & management
Thomas-Dehler-Str. 27, 81737 München, Germany
Tel +49 89 63812-392, Fax -220
Re: command.com versus cmd.exe, Zhongtao Zhu, 2002/09/12
Message not available