Of course Einstein is justly famed for, among many other things, pioneering the idea of space-time. In it I tried to argue that there are some fundamental problems involved in conceptualizing time which, in my mind, appear intractable, and hence its existence as a concept contradictory, impossible. Now do it with another pair of points, but make sure they meet somewhere else. But we shouldn't forget an equally important lesson, articulated most forcefully by Nietzsche: The health of a person and a people also depends vitally on the capacity to forget. And, of course, make good pictures.
In other words, a view of the universe from a materialist perspective at any given moment shows that everything in the univese is different in the sense of being distinct.
The day involved pupils from a variety of schools and colleges, showcasing their digital creativity work.
So is the surface of a donut, or a saddle, or an idealized version of the rolling hills of your favorite pastoral scene. So it is an element of science, but incomplete. The day involved pupils from a variety of schools and colleges, showcasing their digital creativity work.
Imagine taking a point on the sphere, and its antipodal point, and pulling them together to meet somewhere inside the sphere. However, he also thinks that theories are conventions and definitions of concepts, not true descriptions of physical phenomena based necessarily on experimental results. Now maybe we see a revision in the valuation of these ideals, and in both Laughlin and Mandelbrot a movement away from final solutions, formulations and summations.
To which it was replied that of course time has an existence, as a social convention, a mental framework. His country is overstretched, losing economic momentum, losing world leadership, and losing the philosophical plot. The intuitive picture is that of a smooth surface. America at one end is now easily outweighed by any substantial grouping at the other, and most of those powers are on friendly terms with each other.
On the one hand, he makes interesting and insightful observations on all sorts of phenomena; on the other, he never really synthesizes those observations into a single, coherent argument.
So it is an element of science, but incomplete. On the one hand, he makes interesting and insightful observations on all sorts of phenomena; on the other, he never really synthesizes those observations into a single, coherent argument. So, in a sense, the special orthognal matrices look like a sphere.
Without the steady march of time, this unity of behavior disappears, and there are simply a million disparate entities. And, of course, make good pictures. This at least is the goal. In it I tried to argue that there are some fundamental problems involved in conceptualizing time which, in my mind, appear intractable, and hence its existence as a concept contradictory, impossible.
The day involved pupils from a variety of schools and colleges, showcasing their digital creativity work.