[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GLPSOL in webassemby faster than native ?
From: |
Andrew Makhorin |
Subject: |
Re: GLPSOL in webassemby faster than native ? |
Date: |
Fri, 25 Sep 2020 21:13:03 +0300 |
> Something doesn't match for me, because I'm compiling GLPK/glpsol
> with and without optmization and get the same reported cuts:
>
> Cuts on level 0: gmi = 5; mir = 44; cov = 20; clq = 3; !!!!!! *****
> the same
> =====
> Cuts on level 0: gmi = 5; mir = 44; cov = 20; clq = 3; !!!!*****
> the same
> =====
> Cuts on level 0: gmi = 10; mir = 28; cov = 33; clq = 3; !!!!!*****
> not the same
> =====
>
Why do you want glpk to produce absolutely identical results on
different platforms? This has no practical sense.
- Re: GLPSOL in webassemby faster than native ?, (continued)
- Re: GLPSOL in webassemby faster than native ?, Domingo Alvarez Duarte, 2020/09/26
- Re: GLPSOL in webassemby faster than native ?, Domingo Alvarez Duarte, 2020/09/22
- Re: GLPSOL in webassemby faster than native ?, Andrew Makhorin, 2020/09/22
- Re: GLPSOL in webassemby faster than native ?, Domingo Alvarez Duarte, 2020/09/22
- Re: GLPSOL in webassemby faster than native ?, Chris Matrakidis, 2020/09/22
- Re: GLPSOL in webassemby faster than native ?, Domingo Alvarez Duarte, 2020/09/25
- Re: GLPSOL in webassemby faster than native ?,
Andrew Makhorin <=
- Re: GLPSOL in webassemby faster than native ?, Manuel Muñoz Márquez, 2020/09/26
- Re: GLPSOL in webassemby faster than native ?, Andrew Makhorin, 2020/09/26
- Re: GLPSOL in webassemby faster than native ?, Manuel Muñoz Márquez, 2020/09/27
- Re: GLPSOL in webassemby faster than native ?, Andrew Makhorin, 2020/09/27
- Re: GLPSOL in webassemby faster than native ?, Michael Hennebry, 2020/09/27
- Re: GLPSOL in webassemby faster than native ?, Domingo Alvarez Duarte, 2020/09/29
- Re: GLPSOL in webassemby faster than native ?, Michael Hennebry, 2020/09/30
- Re: GLPSOL in webassemby faster than native ?, Heinrich Schuchardt, 2020/09/30