Re: [Help-glpk] Re: Help-glpk Digest, Vol 56, Issue 19

[address@hidden]

If I put the -lcygwin in there, I get the multiple definition error.
If I don't put the -lcygwin in there, I get the missing getreent error.

Is there some compile option I can give that will tell the compiler to 
ignore one of the malloc() or free() definitions?

Joe McCollum
Information Technology Specialist
Forest Inventory and Analysis
Knoxville TN  37919

-- "Ali Baharev" <address@hidden> wrote:
Is it important to use cygwin? There should be no trouble with other
native compilers.

Good luck!

Ali

On 7/24/07, address@hidden <address@hidden> wrote:
> OK I think I'm getting somewhere.
>
> I altered my compile statement to
>
> gcc sample.c -lm -lglpk -lcygwin
>
> Now I get:
>
> multiple definition of _malloc
> multiple definition of _free
> section .rdata overlaps section .text
>
> No executable is produced.
>
> Joe McCollum
> Information Technology Specialist
> Forest Inventory and Analysis
> Knoxville, TN  37919
>
>
>
>
>
> 
_______________________________________________________________________
_
> Save hundreds of dollars a year with Juno Internet access.
> Plans start as low as $9.95 a month. Visit Juno today!
> http://track.juno.com/s/lc?u=http://ads.addynamix.com/click/2-
2130421-170
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Help-glpk mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-glpk
>



________________________________________________________________________
Save hundreds of dollars a year with Juno Internet access.
Plans start as low as $9.95 a month. Visit Juno today!
http://track.juno.com/s/lc?u=http://ads.addynamix.com/click/2-2130421-170