[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [help-GIFT] 'Re: Ups.
From: |
Wolfgang Müller |
Subject: |
Re: [help-GIFT] 'Re: Ups. |
Date: |
Thu, 13 Apr 2006 17:51:16 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.1 |
> Well, the original source of this decision was that the first image
> collection we used it on was one from Television Suisse Romande, in
> which all the images were 256x256. Rescaling to this was a hack to allow
> other images to be indexed with minimal changes to the code.
Oh yes.
> Are you thinking of the one ultimately linking the diameter of the Space
> Shuttle's booster rockets to the width of a horse :)
Exact.
> BTW, I do think that not rescaling will cause serious problems, since
> the feature extraction code is premised on 16x16 blocks at the lowest
> level, and using images of different sizes will result in the same block
> feature ID being used to refer to different image locations for
> different images. IDs are assigned simply by counting.
Yes, this is clear. To translate: all images of one collection are to be
resized to the same size. However, changing this size is not a problem
(within limits). Right?
Cheers,
Wolfgang
--
Dr. Wolfgang Müller
LS Medieninformatik
Universität Bamberg
Check out the SIG MM web site http://www.sigmm.org
- [help-GIFT] 'Re: Ups., risc, 2006/04/06
- Re: [help-GIFT] 'Re: Ups., Wolfgang Müller, 2006/04/06
- Re: [help-GIFT] 'Re: Ups., David Squire, 2006/04/06
- Re: [help-GIFT] 'Re: Ups., risc, 2006/04/13
- Re: [help-GIFT] 'Re: Ups., David Squire, 2006/04/13
- Re: [help-GIFT] 'Re: Ups., Wolfgang Müller, 2006/04/13
- Re: [help-GIFT] 'Re: Ups., David Squire, 2006/04/13
- Re: [help-GIFT] 'Re: Ups.,
Wolfgang Müller <=
- Re: [help-GIFT] 'Re: Ups., David Squire, 2006/04/13
- Re: [help-GIFT] 'Re: Ups., risc, 2006/04/14
- Re: [help-GIFT] 'Re: Ups., risc, 2006/04/13
Re: [help-GIFT] 'Re: Ups., risc, 2006/04/06