[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [help-GIFT] viper/gift log files
From: |
David Squire |
Subject: |
Re: [help-GIFT] viper/gift log files |
Date: |
Tue, 06 Mar 2001 10:34:18 +1100 |
Wolfgang Mueller wrote:
> DMS> Putting this stuff in the log file is fine, but I can't see why you
> wouldn't
> DMS> send it. One of the nice things about the MRML logs (as opposed to my
> earlier
> DMS> ad hoc ones) is that they are a true record of what actually passed
> between
> DMS> client and server. I would not like to see that principle
> DMS> changed.
>
> I see this point. Let's say: we can send it, but we do not expect
> other people to send it in cases where it's redundant?
>
> What I see as important is to keep the load low for people developing
> an MRML server.
Fair enough. Perhaps the MRML spec. could flag various tags and attributes as
"optional" (if that is not already the case).
> DMS> Question: what happens if there are multiple sessions started from the
> same IP?
> DMS> How is this resolved? What if there are multiple sessions from the same
> IP with
> DMS> the same user name?
>
> Q1) sockets do that for you. There can be multiple connections over
> one socket. We don't care, we read and write from/to different file
> descriptors.
> Q2) You can have multiple open sessions for one user. Trouble begins
> when a person asks twice for the same session to be opened.
Sure. I was aware that sockets handled this. My question was really about how
this
would look in the log file - can these situations be distinguished?
Cheers,
David
--
Dr. David McG. Squire
Computer Science and Software Engineering, Monash University, Australia
http://www.csse.monash.edu.au/~davids/ http://viper.unige.ch/
Do/Don't want HTML mail? Let me know.